Winter tires comparison tests. Big test of winter tires: the choice "Behind the wheel"! More attention to the budget segment
Braking performance was evaluated on snow, ice, wet and dry asphalt. The tests were carried out at various temperatures and the average result was determined after 15-20 runs. On ice the car was stopped from 50 km / h, on snow and wet surfaces - from 80 km / h. Tests on snowy and icy surfaces were carried out both outdoors and indoors, where temperature and humidity control eliminates the influence of weather.
Tractive effort on snow and ice was estimated using the fastest acceleration from 5 to 35 and from 5 to 20 km / h, respectively. The tests were also carried out at various temperatures on the track and in the indoor complex.
Handling scores were based on lap times, and several drivers also gave their opinions on how tires accelerate, brake, and corner on various surfaces. The tests were carried out blindly, meaning the pilots did not know which tires were installed on the car. In the same way, directional stability was assessed, that is, the ability of the tires to maintain the direction of travel without the need for steering.
In the noise test, the pilots also made subjective assessments, making several runs on uneven surfaces. Finally, rolling resistance was measured as follows - the car rolled freely, slowing down from 80 to 40 km / h, on a flat surface without the influence of wind. The tests were run at two different temperatures and the percentage increase in consumption was calculated over the most fuel efficient tires.
Test World emphasized that all tires were purchased over the counter at various stores. If tires were not yet available on the market, they were sent by the manufacturer, but after the start of sales, the results of these tires were additionally checked.
Scandinavian regulations do not limit the number of studs in tires. More precisely, there are no restrictions for manufacturers whose new tires have been tested by an independent organization that has confirmed that the effect of studs on road wear does not exceed acceptable values. If the tests are successful, the manufacturer can choose the type of studs and their number at their discretion.
Another option is to abandon these tests and reduce the number of studs to the maximum permitted value, that is, 50 pieces per running meter of tread - in the size 205/55 R16, this means that there should be less than a hundred studs. Of the 12 participants in this test, only three manufacturers decided to follow this path.
Increasing the number of studs improves grip on ice. This is a logical consequence, and the test results almost always confirm it. Be that as it may, a large number of pimples alone does not guarantee success in the entire test, although on ice it does give a definite advantage.
The more studs there are, the more noise there will usually be, which can be quite annoying while driving. When driving on asphalt, studs can also negatively affect handling, stability and even braking performance.
In addition, grip on icy surfaces is provided by the penetration of the stud into the ice surface. In order for the spike to "grab" the ice, a certain amount of energy is required. The more studs, the less pressure there will be on one individual stud, and when driving on hard ice in cold weather, the grip of tires with fewer studs can be stronger.
Nokian shook up the studded tire market a couple of years ago with 190 studs - 50-100% more than other tires on the market at the time. Since then, Nokian tires have won one test after another, but their lead is gradually diminishing.
This year, the Continental tires are also fitted with 190 studs. It's easy to guess who they were targeting when they determined this amount, but be that as it may, the results are still excellent.
Hankook is in third place in terms of the number of spikes, with 170 of them. The Korean manufacturer is investing heavily in R&D and the experts said it was good to see good winter tires coming from Asia. As a representative of one of the manufacturers said, 10 years ago, the characteristics of Korean tires were a reason for jokes for many in the industry, but now they are no longer laughing at even in large European companies.
A large group of test participants fitted 130 studs to their tires. Goodyear, Bridgestone and Pirelli are well-known manufacturers, so it was logical to take their tires to the test. Second-tier tires include Sava, Dunlop and the former Nokian, which are now offered as Nordman. They are all inexpensive and less high-tech alternatives to tires from premium brands.
Michelin, Gislaved and Chinese Linglong have less than a hundred studs, meaning these tires have not passed the wear test road surface... The first two are premium models, however, the other parameters do not seem to compensate for the lack of grip on the ice when compared to tires with more studs. As for Linglong, the tires of this company have already participated in the Finnish tests, being one of the best winter tires from China.
Friction tire designers do not need to worry about the number of studs, but their absence must be compensated for in one way or another, and this creates a number of other problems. There are a limited number of tools available to improve ice grip on non-studded tires, and mostly engineers use new materials and improved tread patterns while making the compound as soft as possible. However, if you overdo it with the softness of the rubber compound, other problems may arise, the worst of which is poor grip on wet asphalt, unstable handling and low wear resistance.
In recent years, Nokian and Continental have occupied the top positions in friction tire tests. Even without studs, their tires provide impressive traction on ice, but buyers will have to put up with sluggish steering response on the pavement or choose other tires that will again have weaker grip.
Goodyear's friction tires emphasized handling on asphalt, which only slightly impaired grip in winter conditions, and Michelin has always preferred to create a balance of performance without any obvious flaws. Pirelli and Bridgestone are old proven brands, but their models in this test differ from those tested before.
Two tires from a lower price segment were added to the list - Nordman from Nokian and Nankang from a Taiwanese manufacturer, which is known for its quite successful summer tires... This test showed whether their winter tires can compete with products from European companies.
The tire business is full of all sorts of information about how different types of winter tire wear and how wear affects grip. Some say that friction tires wear out twice as fast as studded ones, while others are convinced that due to stud wear after a couple of years, the grip of studded tires will be weaker than that of non-studded ones.
Test World selected six tire models from last year's - four studded, two frictional - and tested their wear by driving them 15,000 km on asphalt roads in cold weather, which is roughly the equivalent of two winter seasons. The route mainly ran along highways, but each tire had a hundred brakes and accelerations at low speeds to simulate urban traffic conditions.
The tests used three cars that followed the same route under the same conditions. Two tires of each model were taken and transferred from the front axle to the rear. Thus, at the end of the test, all tires traveled the same distance on the front and rear axles, and in addition, drivers also changed cars to avoid influencing the result of their driving style.
The tires were tested for braking performance on ice prior to the start of the test, after which the same tests were carried out every 5000 km. It is noteworthy that both types of tires lost grip in about the same way, and after 15,000 km its level dropped by about 20%. In addition, the grip deterioration was similar for different brands of tires, and the balance of power did not change during the entire test. This suggests that the test results of new tires allow us to judge how these or those tires will behave when worn out.
However, in terms of durability, the tires differed from each other. The table shows how many kilometers they can travel before the depth of their tread is reduced to 3 mm. Michelin has historically been known as a tire with particularly good durability, and tests on the selected model have once again confirmed this reputation. It should be noted that the results will always depend on the vehicle, the quality of the roads and the driving style.
With the exception of Michelin, all other tires in both categories wear approximately the same, and after the test, their tread depth has decreased by 2 mm. Frictional Continental wear was only 1.5 mm, but, as in the case of Michelin, due to the relatively small initial tread depth of up to 3 mm, they wear out faster. It should be recalled that high wear resistance can negatively affect adhesion, and the buyer must decide for himself which parameter is more important to him.
Test World notes that while the differences between the tested tires may look minor on paper, in reality they can be more than obvious in everyday life, and this applies not only to braking performance, but also to cornering grip and steering response. ... According to experts, the worst tires in the test practically do not allow you to control the car on slippery surfaces, so Test World reminds that when choosing winter tires, you should not focus only on price and buy cheap tires. Tests by various organizations show year after year that low-cost Asian tires do not provide the optimal level of safety, and an accident will be much more costly, not to mention other, more serious risks.
TEST RESULTS
Left: Braking on ice (Braking distance from 50 to 0 km / h, m)
Right: Acceleration on ice (Acceleration time from 5 to 20 km / h, s)
Left: Handling on ice (Lap time, s)
Right: Ice handling (Subjective assessments, points)
Left: Snow braking
Right: Acceleration in the snow (Acceleration time from 5 to 35 km / h, s)
Left: Snow handling (Lap time, s)
Right: Snow handling (Subjective assessments, points)
Left: Handling on wet asphalt (Lap time, s)
Right: Handling on wet pavement (Subjective assessments, points)
Left: Braking on dry asphalt (Braking distance from 80 km / h, m)
Right: Handling on dry asphalt (Points)
Left: Noise (Points)
Right: Rolling resistance (Difference in fuel consumption, %)
The expert opinions on each tire are presented below
Studded tires:
| A place | Tire | Expert opinion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:3/2015 The country of manufacture:Finland Nokian scored top marks in all ice disciplines where they have short braking distances and high lateral grip, clearly aided by the presence of 190 studs. On the snow, the tires were also among the best, and they showed their weaknesses in tests for braking performance and handling on wet pavement. Experts noted that it is normal for maximum grip on ice to be the top priority when designing tires.
|
||
| 2 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:4/2015 The country of manufacture:Germany The Continental also performed well in the ice tests, although in terms of braking and acceleration efficiency they were still slightly inferior to the Nokian. At the same time, the pilots awarded them 10 points for behavior that was stable and predictable. On the snowy track, the Continental was also one of the leaders, and they are clearly better than the Nokian on the wet surface. In other words, they are tires that are able to handle any conditions optimally and have no obvious disadvantages.
|
||
| 2 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:2/2015 The country of manufacture:South Korea Hankook is taking a podium spot, so the Korean brand is likely to become one of the leading players in the harsh winter tire market. The Hankook has short braking distances and high traction on both snow and ice, and was one of the fastest tires on twisty trails, indicating their ability to maintain traction in a variety of situations. On wet pavement, Hankooks also quickly stop the car, but at the same time they can go into a skid too abruptly, and they do not have very good information content.
|
||
| 4 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:43/2014 The country of manufacture:Poland Goodyear has probably outperformed all other studded tires this time around in terms of balance of ride performance on different surfaces. They are quite a bit behind best tires on snow and ice, where they have short braking distances and good handling. The only weakness is the relatively low grip on wet pavement, but pilots noted that the tires behaved consistently and safely.
|
||
| 4 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:91T Manufacturing date:48/2014 The country of manufacture:Germany Another good result for Pirelli. On ice, the tires behave confidently and reliably without giving any unpleasant surprises, and on snow the Pirelli has a relatively long braking distance, but good traction and high lateral grip. In addition to this, the Pirelli proved to be one of the best studded tires on wet asphalt where they also have very stable handling. The downside is that the Pirelli's noise is louder than most other tires.
|
||
| 6 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:43/2014 The country of manufacture:Poland Dunlop were able to earn a large number of points, not least because they were among the best on wet and dry asphalt. On snow and ice, they also performed well enough, but not as stable as the leaders. Acceleration and braking on ice is fine, as well as deceleration on snow. In this case, lateral stability on a snow-covered track could be higher.
|
||
| 7 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:6/2015 The country of manufacture:Germany Gislaved is a second-tier brand from Continental, and the tire performance is also less impressive. On snow, the tires have excellent results in terms of both braking and handling. On icy surfaces, the Gislaved, which has just 96 studs, lagged behind some other tires, but nevertheless earned praise for its good stability and lateral grip, which gave pilots more confidence. Directional stability is excellent, but the Gislaved has high rolling resistance.
|
||
| 8 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:37/2014 The country of manufacture:Russia Unlike most other studded tires, Michelin is not so strongly focused on improving grip on ice, and it is also inferior to other tires on snowy surfaces. The only positive thing is that the tires performed very smoothly in all disciplines. On dry and wet asphalt, Michelin performs better than many other studded tires and has reduced noise levels. In addition, as shown in a separate test, Michelin can please with very high durability.
|
||
| 9 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:12/2014 The country of manufacture:Japan On the ice, Bridgestne received high subjective ratings because the pilots liked their handling. At the same time, on the snow-covered track, Bridgestone took rather low places in all disciplines, that is, the grip on the snow still needs work. On wet and dry asphalt, Bridgestone stops the car quickly enough, but they can lose cornering grip too quickly and have slower steering response. In addition, Bridgestone will increase fuel consumption due to its high rolling resistance.
|
||
| 9 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:91T Manufacturing date:4/2014 The country of manufacture:Poland The Sava is an inexpensive tire that would perform well on ice if it weren't for too long stopping distances. At the same time, on snow they are inferior to the rest of the studded tires in terms of both braking efficiency and traction, and the skid can start too quickly. On dry asphalt, the Sava ranked among the best tires.
|
||
| 11 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:48/2014 The country of manufacture:Russia The budget Nordmans are manufactured by Nokian, but their performance is far from the Hakkapeliitta tires. On ice they have relatively weak traction and long braking distances, on snow they were a little better, but on wet asphalt the tires again did not perform well. It should be added that the tires behave in a predictable manner, without any unpleasant surprises.
|
||
| 12 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T Manufacturing date:41/2014 The country of manufacture:China Don't be fooled by the name Winter Max Grip - in fact, the Linglong has very poor grip on snow and ice, and in fact it is inferior to even some non-studded tires on icy surfaces. The only nice thing is the short braking distance on the snow. At the same time, Linglong performed very well in the tests on wet and dry asphalt, and they also have excellent directional stability.
|
||
Non-studded tires:
| A place | Tire | Expert opinion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94R The country of manufacture:Finland Nokian's friction tires also clearly strive to outperform all competitors on ice, and in this year's test, the Finnish brand's tires performed better in braking performance, handling and lateral grip on icy surfaces. Experts noted that even after losing traction, Nokian maintains control of the car. On dry and wet pavement, soft Nokians are expected to have poor grip and long braking distances.
|
||
| 2 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T The country of manufacture:Poland Goodyears accelerate and brake quickly on snow and ice, but they have some lateral stability issues that can cause tires to skid too quickly at the grip limit - however, maintaining control is easy enough. On dry and wet pavement, Goodyear has proven to be one of the best, with very effective braking and precise responses during emergency maneuvers. Overall, Goodyear has to be given credit as their tires performed reasonably well on all types of surfaces.
|
||
| 2 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T The country of manufacture:Spain Michelin also performed well in almost all disciplines. The tires have short stopping distances in both snow and ice and are stable in most emergency situations. In this case, Michelin can still lose grip on the front axle. On wet and dry asphalt, Michelin showed good braking performance and lateral grip, albeit not as high as the best tires.
|
||
| 2 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T The country of manufacture:Russia On ice Pirelli became one of the best studless tires, and their performance on the snow was even better, because the tires are very confident in emergency maneuvers. Pirelli also has excellent wet handling characteristics, where they bring the car to a standstill quickly and provide optimum maneuverability. In this case, on a dry surface, grip can be lost too sharply. The noise level is low.
|
||
| 5 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T The country of manufacture:Germany The Continental also ranks as one of the best friction tires, thanks in part to its short braking distances, high lateral grip and good handling on ice. The Continental also performed well on snow, although they can skid at high steering angles. On dry and wet pavement, the tires have relatively good braking performance, but they feel too soft to get in the way in an emergency.
|
||
| 6 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94R The country of manufacture:Russia Nordman lagged slightly behind the leaders in their category, as they have relatively poor acceleration and braking performance on ice, and the front wheels can lose traction too easily during sharp maneuvers. On snow, performance is noticeably better, especially in terms of lateral stability and stability behavior. On wet and dry asphalt, the Nordman has poor grip and slow steering response, but at least they won't skid.
|
||
| 7 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94T The country of manufacture:Japan Bridgestone's major weaknesses have been demonstrated on ice, where they have long braking distances, slow acceleration and lose traction too easily in corners, especially on the front axle. The tires are more reliable on snow due to the high lateral force and braking performance of the best tires, so it is a little surprising that Bridgestone performed very poorly on wet asphalt. On dry surfaces, the grip is much higher and the tires handle emergency maneuvers well.
|
||
| 8 |
|
Load / Speed \u200b\u200bIndex:94Q The country of manufacture:China Nankang has dropped to the bottom line in most disciplines. On ice they have weak longitudinal and lateral grip, and on snow the situation was much the same unfortunate. Lateral stability is low, so you can't feel safe. On wet pavement, the tires also lagged behind the rest, and in general the Nankang simply cannot match the really good quality winter tires.
|
||
Seasonal tire change is a prerequisite for the operation of vehicles. Each type of rubber is designed for specific weather conditions. This is influenced by the composition of the material of manufacture, the tread pattern and the presence of additional elements.
When, according to the law, you need to change your shoes to winter tires in 2016
Timely rubber change from 01.11 .2015 is fixed on legislative level. The technical regulations of the customs union (TR CU) in Appendix 8, section 5 .5 indicate that winter tires with spikes are prohibited to use in summer - from June to August. The same applies to summer rubber models, for which the restriction is December, January and February. 
In fact, there are no clear rules for when to change shoes to winter tires in 2016. Information on amendments to the Law No. 16-ФЗ "On Transport Safety" regarding the procedure for changing tires of one type to another is not true. Therefore, the issuance of fines by traffic police officers on the basis of the existing regulations is illegal. An exception is the minimum tread depth on winter tires, which should not be less than 4 mm. In this case, a fine of 500 rubles may be issued.
But for your own safety, it is recommended to adhere to the rules for replacing tires on a car from summer to winter:
- Constant air temperature less than +5 ° С. Summer models change their properties, which leads to a deterioration in traction;
- If winter tires are marked "M S" - they can be used from September 1 to the end of spring;
- Take into account the climatic features of the region. This applies to the installation of studded tires.
It is imperative to check the condition of winter tires - the degree of deformation of the tread, the presence of defects.
The best winter tires 2015 -2016: test, ratings, reviews
There are several factors to consider when choosing the best winter tires. The main one is the quality of tires and their appearance. Additionally, the date of manufacture (no more than 2-3 years), load index (depends on the weight of the car), speed index, wear resistance.
The following classification of winter tires is conventionally adopted:
- European. Maximum grip in rain or wet snow. They have a diagonal pattern with many thin cuts;
- Scandinavian. Designed for driving on a snowy or icy track. Are characterized by sparse pattern, there are many sipes (small stripes) on the treads;
- Studded. The best option for icy conditions. The pins can be round or quadrangular shape;
- With an asymmetrical pattern. The inner part contributes to better grip on snowy surfaces, while the outer part contributes to the asphalt.
For selection it is recommended to study the test of winter tires 2015 - 2016. This can be data from expert publications or specialized companies. It is important to read the reviews about operational properties of a particular model of winter tires.
Test of winter tires R16 2016 according to the magazine "Behind the wheel"
For the test of winter tires, experts from the magazine "Za Rulem" identified a number of factors. The most interesting results were shown by the R16 studded tires. They were evaluated in terms of cross-country ability, the quality of adhesion to various surfaces, directional stability and the impact on fuel consumption. Based on this, five most optimal models were identified. 
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7
They went on sale in 2009. When traveling on ice, they showed optimal longitudinal grip. Also on this surface there was a good acceleration and braking, cornering stability is good. Good maneuverability when driving in deep snow. It is not lost when switching between driving modes.
On dry pavement, braking is weak, the noise from the spikes penetrates into the interior. However, on long trips, there was no abrasion of the studs - the decrease in the height of the protrusion was 0.1 mm. 
2 ContiIce Contact
They began to be sold in Russia in 2010. Tests on classic "winter" tracks have shown good results. On ice and snow, the grip is excellent for all directions. With a significant amount of snow, advance is possible only by slipping.
There is also a small indicator informativeness on the steering wheel. The test on wet and dry asphalt showed the best results. Braking and acceleration are carried out according to the technical data of the vehicle. Control adjustments are minimal. 
3 Michelin X —Ice North 2
Tire sales have been carried out since 2009. The characteristic difference is the spikes with a large core. On ice, grip is average in the longitudinal direction and good in the transverse direction. On a snow-covered track, these indicators show good management.
Braking on dry and wet asphalt within normal limits. Damping of minor fluctuations is noted. The disadvantages include the noise level. 
4 Pirelli Winter Carving Edge
The first models have been on sale since 2008. The manufacturer is constantly improving the model, but without external changes. Experts note the optimal properties of lateral and longitudinal grip on ice. The same figures are for high snow cover.
But for good grip you have to sacrifice comfort. Trips around asphalted routes are accompanied by high noise levels. Fuel consumption is average regardless of driving style. 
5 Nordman 4
Sold in Russia since 2009. They performed well on an icy road. All grip types are good. Problems arise on a snow-covered track - there is a dependence on the density of snow, with small turning angles it is not enough informativeness.
On asphalt surfaces need constant course correction. Vibration is observed on small irregularities. The noise rises after 40 km / h.
Winter tire test Behind the wheel 2015
Ranking of the best winter studded tires in 2015-2016
For a full-fledged analysis of studded rubber, it is necessary to take into account not only the opinion of Za Rulem experts. In addition to them, the best winter studded tires 2015-2016 were determined by several other specialized companies - "Tuulilasi", "AutoReview" and the publication "Test Word". Based on this data, an optimal tire rating was formed. 
1 Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8
The main advantages of this model include a large number of spikes - 190 pcs. In order to reduce the mass, special fillers were introduced, the presence of which did not affect the decrease in mechanical strength. Tires characterized by good handling on snowy and icy roads, have a minimum braking distance on asphalt coating.
2 Continental ContiIceContact
The material of manufacture has been modified - components have been added to it that increase the service life at low temperatures and high humidity. Good have recommended yourself when riding on all types of snowy and icy surfaces. The disadvantage is the slippage caused by contact with the mixture of water and ice. 
3 Pirelli Winter Ice Zero
These studded winter tires can be classified as middle class. When driving on snow or ice surfaces, good control is observed. Optimal braking distance when stopping on icy asphalt and water.
However, when cornering, grip is not good enough. The braking distance is also increased by asphalt coating. 
4 Nokian Nordman 5
To increase traction with the track, a special stud is installed in the upper part of the tread, shaped like a bear's paw. Additionally worth noting democratic cost, good handling characteristics of the car when traveling in the winter.
The degree of operating comfort is low - high noise level and problems with sensitivity when cornering, relatively long braking distances on dry asphalt. 
5 Goodyear UltraGripIce Arctic
In this winter model studded rubber was applied original v—figurative spike. IN totality with pattern tread is created reliable clutch with road surface. TO disadvantages can carry reduced controllability at sharp maneuvers.
Rating the best winter non-studded tire 2015 —2016 r
Availability thorns on tires not always acceptable for some conditions exploitation. IN features this concerns frequent travel by dry asphalt covering. IN the result of this thorns are erased, part of them falls off, what leads to deterioration properties winter rubber.
For solutions this problems manufacturers were developed non-studded model tire. Their feature is an composition rubber, which not changes at impact low temperatures. So called « velcro» will allow to rule by car as on icy or snowy track, so and on dry or wet asphalt.
1 Nokian HakkapeliittaR2
A leader rating winter tires 2015 —2016 r their made good controllability on all types coverings, optimal indicators passability. Consumption fuel not rises, level noise minimum. Optimally fit for travel by trails or off road.
Manufacturer necessary to work over improving brake qualities on dry asphalt. But this not critical, so as value brake the way not exceeds permissible.
2 GoodyearUltraGripIce2
Recommended exploitation in urban conditions or on equipped trails. Their the best quality winter tires showed on paved surfaces. Whatever from degree icing or level snow identified good transverse clutch on ice. Minimum brake way at clutch with asphalt surface.
3 Continental ContiVikingContact 6
TO positive parties these tire can carry quick acceleration without slippage on snowy road. Also celebrated good brake quality on wet asphalt. Thanks to picture tread transverse clutch on ice one thing of the best for tires of this class.
IN progress trials it was identified fuzzy following course in time travel on asphalt road. it due to elevated indicators rigidity.
We took tires from different price groups - from 2470 to 5150 rubles apiece. The most recent model - Toyo Observe GSi ‑ 6, rolled out to the market this season. There are two new items from last year: German Continental VikingContact 7 and Finnish Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3... Updated last year, Russian production.
To be fair
We have arranged the tires according to the points scored. And now let's see how economically profitable it is to buy these or those tires. To do this, let's compare the average price of each model with the so-called fair price - corresponding to the level of its consumer properties, that is, the number of points earned.
The best deal was the Hankook Winter i * cept iZ² with a price 23% below the fair price. A little less (17%) will save Viatti. At the time of buying tire Nordman RS2, Pirelli Ice Zero FR, Toyo Observe GSi ‑ 6 or Triangle SnowLink PL01 benefit from 9 to 5%.
You will have to pay extra for the rest of the test participants. The minimum overpayment - 3% - awaits when buying Gislaved Soft * Frost 200 tires. The cost of Roadstone WinGuard ice, Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 and Sailun Ice Blazer WSL2 tires is 7-9% higher than the fair value. The rating is closed by two distinguished test participants - the winner ... and the loser. The outsider Cachland CH-W2002 will have to overpay 11%. He was not as cheap as weak. Continental VikingContact 7, the most expensive participant, is overvalued by 15%. If you want a quality and balanced product, be ready to fork out.
A beginner, like a professional driver with many years of experience, must understand that the personal safety of the car user will depend on the correct selection of tires according to the season, which may affect passengers and other participants. road traffic. This season for 2015-2016 will help to determine the choice of a worthy brand in the automotive market.
Kumho I'ZEN KW31 - no worse than the rest
But somehow even better ... Another candidate for operation this winter with a thrifty check from a car dealership. It was possible to get into the rating thanks to optimization for excellent performance characteristics: braking, maneuvering on ice surfaces. Extended service life will be another plus for this rubber. The variety of sizes will impress every car enthusiast.
Nokian Nordman 5 - not like everyone else
The spikes for this shoe are endowed with a "bear's claw" presented in the form of a protrusion. The presence of such an element is due to the creation of the tension necessary to improve the adhesion properties. As a result of such an intricate design, at the time of braking, the stud remains perpendicular to the road surface. Optimal conditions when working on ice, snow. And on the asphalt, the product did not hit the dirt with the face of its brand. With all this, the price of each kit is much lower than that of its predecessors. The product deserves to be included in the rating winter tires 2015-2016 season, remaining among the leaders in the next cold season. When familiarizing yourself with the specified parameters, the question arises whether it makes sense to get something more, if you already have everything you need that can be obtained at a reasonable price.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c - masterly embodiment of forms
Along with the previous design innovations, you can put this rubber model on the list for comparison. The famous brand amazed again with its fantasy, embodied with modern technologies... This novelty is equipped with a special wheel structure. It has three-dimensional sawtooth lamellae. These innovations are used to provide improved traction on loose snow and reduce slipping on ice. The lateral grooves remove snow and mud masses instantly.
Michelin X-Ice Xi3 - for conquering all latitudes
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 leader of the coming winter
Tops the tire rating. Thanks to the abundance of studs, the content of special components in the rubber, the tire is lightweight, but no less of a quality. Controllability during high-speed races in conditions of melting snow is optimal, as well as on frozen and snowy surfaces. In wet and dry conditions, the braking distance is minimal. It is the unanimous leader who passed the 2015-2016 winter tire test with an excellent mark.
It should be added that in addition to technical characteristics products, test tests are influenced to a certain extent by weather conditions, technical condition vehicle, driving speed, road conditions. Each of the listed criteria can affect any of the indicators that experts assess when conducting tests.
"Michelin"- a French company, one of the world leaders in the production car tires... It has about 70 enterprises around the world, as well as 5 research technology centers (in France, the USA and Japan) and 5 test sites (in France, the USA and Spain).
In addition to the main brand of the same name, the Michelin group of companies owns other well-known brands, such as Kleber, Goodrich, Wolber, Riken, Tyremaster, Uniroyal, Taurus and others.
Site: www.michelin.ru
Michelin also has its own tire manufacturing plant in Russia. It is located in the village of Davydovo, Orekhovo-Zuevsky District, Moscow Region. The production capacity there is not the largest - about 2 million tires a year, but it is there that the only tire studding shop in the company is located, in which all the tires produced by Michelin in Europe are studded.
In Russia, Michelin tires are sold either of our own production, or produced at the European factories of the company in Italy and Hungary.
"Michelin X-Ice North 3" Is a new winter studded tire that incorporates a wide variety of innovative technologies developed by Michelin. Most of them are combined into one complex called “Smart Stud System” and includes:
- Thermoactive rubber compound, which is used as the inner tread layer and which is able to change its elasticity depending on the ambient temperature: at high temperatures it becomes soft and the studs seem to be pressed into the tread, significantly improving grip on asphalt; at low temperatures, it becomes stiff, making the very fixation of the studs more rigid and thereby increasing traction on an icy surface.
- Ice Powder Remover technology designed to remove ice chips and is a system of 6 wells that absorb this ice crumb around each spike.
- The design of the spike itself, which looks like a cylinder with a tapered tip, which is installed on a wide base, which ensures reliable fixation of the spike.
The tread pattern of the Michelin X-Ice North 3 has an increased number of grip edges for improved grip on snowy roads. The angle of the drainage channels was also changed, which increased the resistance to aquaplaning and slashplenning. These tires use the new Flex-Ice 3 rubber compound, which contains a proportionate natural and synthetic rubber compound to achieve improved wet grip. In addition, it contains silicon additives that contribute to wear resistance.
To strengthen the tire carcass, the IronFlex technology was applied, which consists in the use of an additional layer of steel filaments and provides additional impact resistance.